The Grandfather Paradox vs The Self Publishing Moral (Escape)

The Grandfather Paradox vs The Self Publishing Moral


Given that all things inside a paradox are equal and that entropy cannot exist, how then can human fallible consciousness exist?

Prose: like the hamster on the wheel, the human consciousness goes forth without knowledge of itself.

Given that all things inside a paradox are not equal, as shown with the Clockwork Paradox, which means entropy must exist, then it is inevitable that the human moral consciousness would eventually exit the scenario.

Prose: A human would become disgusted with their own existence and so avoid becoming their own grandfather.

No matter how many times, the same person gave into the lustful and self-determinate desires, within the paradox, eventually, entropy would catch up to them even inside the paradox.

Question: How can this be when the energy is identical?

Given that the Big Bang is the beginning and this paradox take place at a later date, time is still an external force and not central as supposed, a paradox is more like the eye of a storm in time rather than a hamster wheel that time does not tell to stop.

I'll explain..

Every existence has a 'sum of morals' good bad bannal exciting, that begins with life and ends with death. If a moral can never be published, due to time cycling indefinitely, time cannot escape to further the existence of creation past the point of the cycle. What I'm saying is, it would be the end of the universe.. dramatic yes. I don't feel I am explaining this well..

Imagine while creating a paradox you also undid it..

Imagine there is a robot at the end of time, they decided that their existence has been too long, they go back and destroy the robot that created them, but in doing so they wiped out their existence and so they did not come back to destroy the robot that created them, and so they did exist and come back.. and so on..

Time is a lot like nature in many respects, if harnessed by an individual through their own perception, time behaves naturally, but if harnessed by a machine the nature of time becomes violent and unpredictable. Creation is built upon the principle of consequence, if you remove consequence, you remove the moral imperative for time to behave as you would expect. And given that time publishes consequence like humans publish morals, changing the natural order of things would not guarantee 'a hamster on a wheel'.