Something I keep thinking about.. in the movie Interstellar the principal of time dynamics is demonstrated.
Being closer to a black hole means time travels slower.. now, the singularity is a place of infinite density and all qualities, from our perspective the singularity has passed, however the Singularity still exists in its first state as it transcends time.. sounds sci-fi or hippy huh?
Let me explain:
Conservation of energy says that you cannot destroy energy you can merely change its state. So it follows.. the singularity had enough energy to achieve the escape velocity of light, what I am saying is the energy available to the singularity is infinite and so it follows; it transcends time, as if you were to exceed the speed of light you would start going backwards in time..
Space-Time is not as assumed a constant*, but is relative to the observer, here is my very rough 'Space-Time Clock':
So from our perspective, the edge of universe is travelling faster than light, this is both wrong and right, if you were at the edge of the universe light would travel at it's nominal speed, but because we are closer to the singularity light seems to be travelling faster than its usual speed.
The closer the observer is to the singularity, the slower time is as a constant, meaning an observer could see us as travelling faster than their constant local light speed observation if closer to the singularity.
So time is relative to the observer.. and so with the singularity there can be no observer. The energy is in a state of both changing and stasis because time does not behave in anyway of our understanding.
The Age of the Universe
With all this in mind, think about how the singularity expanded, and imagine there are two planets that were created at the same time in approximately same place .. one closer to the singularity old/young than 14 billion years old.. now imagine there is a planet at the edge of the universe which is also 14 billion years old/young.. one is pristine like it is new the other is crumbling with age.
How so? If merely a black hole can affect/effect time which is simply a 'bug on the windshield' of the singularity, think well how the expression of the singularity in our what I'll call 'timestream', a timestream I'll define as a dimension of time that adheres to our perception. This is because as mentioned when dealing with the singularity it is infinite..
I'll add as a believer it's the expression of God's divinity in our universe.. but you do not need to be a believer to accept the singularity as a work/machine of the absolute sublime. Perfection.
This is because as mentioned when dealing with the singularity it is infinite.. this includes extra dimensions that we do not understand. But time is one of our dimensions and we do understand.
So returning to those two planets, twins of a sort, one was caught up in the gravity of a star and thrown out to the edge of the universe but the other stayed in that solar system to be an orbiting planet; close to the singularity.
We'll call the planet next to the singularity 'Center'
And we'll call the planet at the edge of the universe 'Rogue'.
In this case Center is left pristine and time for Center has barely passed due to the affect/effects of the singularity, but Rogue has deteriorated greatly, even though moving relatively to the singularity faster than light, the further it gets from the influence of gravity the older it gets.
We upon the earth are at a 'mid-point' between these two.. so we say the age of the universe is 14.5 billion years old. (re-estimated recently as 13.7 billion years old)
It is both. it is neither, it is schrodinger's cat.
Some stars in relative to the singularity have much much less gravitation force applied to it and so time is not as slowed.. and conversely the opposite is true the more exposure to the singularity the younger the star will be regardless of when it was created..
And if we go back to the original point of the singularity we may find it is still there, pristine and new and in the first micro seconds of expression.. we would not be able to observe it, we would only feel its gravitational affects/effects.
I would say.. the singularity is unobservable, because if it could be observable it would change its structure to become un-observable as all forces of this magnitude are naturally inclined.
So to us.. observable stars give us clues to their age, but if we could measure the stars at the edge of our universe and the age of the stars closest to the singularity.. so to us the universe is around 14 billion years old.. if we could measure both accurately we would have three points and an average.. so we would find out if my idea is correct.
Perhaps.. and I am an advocate of faster than light speeds.. but perhaps when the expression of the singularity happens/happening/happened the outer edge of the those expressions are obeying the speed of light, its just from our perspective they are travelling faster than light as we are closer to the singularity and so the center of greater gravity (see illustration above), so the edge of the universe could be travelling at the speed of light but because we observe it from a location closer to the singularity it seems it is travelling faster than light.
This theory of mine explains a lot of discrepancies in other peoples theories.
I think I will call my theory 'Schrodinger's Clock'. The two states being time, one older, one younger.
Wish I could send this to be checked by a physicist.. not sure what to do. I'm a musician by education.
-------------
Things that make sense..
The flatter space-time is, the freer the objects are to move faster away from the singularity, this is not only based on how gravity affects space itself, increasing one objects gravity on another, but the flater space is the less an object is part of that part of the universe.. so.. off the top of my head.. we could perceive tachyons that came from the edge of the universe, travelling back towards the singularity.
So time is relative to the observer.. and so with the singularity there can be no observer. The energy is in a state of both changing and stasis because time does not behave in anyway of our understanding.
The Age of the Universe
With all this in mind, think about how the singularity expanded, and imagine there are two planets that were created at the same time in approximately same place .. one closer to the singularity old/young than 14 billion years old.. now imagine there is a planet at the edge of the universe which is also 14 billion years old/young.. one is pristine like it is new the other is crumbling with age.
How so? If merely a black hole can affect/effect time which is simply a 'bug on the windshield' of the singularity, think well how the expression of the singularity in our what I'll call 'timestream', a timestream I'll define as a dimension of time that adheres to our perception. This is because as mentioned when dealing with the singularity it is infinite..
I'll add as a believer it's the expression of God's divinity in our universe.. but you do not need to be a believer to accept the singularity as a work/machine of the absolute sublime. Perfection.
This is because as mentioned when dealing with the singularity it is infinite.. this includes extra dimensions that we do not understand. But time is one of our dimensions and we do understand.
So returning to those two planets, twins of a sort, one was caught up in the gravity of a star and thrown out to the edge of the universe but the other stayed in that solar system to be an orbiting planet; close to the singularity.
We'll call the planet next to the singularity 'Center'
And we'll call the planet at the edge of the universe 'Rogue'.
In this case Center is left pristine and time for Center has barely passed due to the affect/effects of the singularity, but Rogue has deteriorated greatly, even though moving relatively to the singularity faster than light, the further it gets from the influence of gravity the older it gets.
We upon the earth are at a 'mid-point' between these two.. so we say the age of the universe is 14.5 billion years old. (re-estimated recently as 13.7 billion years old)
It is both. it is neither, it is schrodinger's cat.
Some stars in relative to the singularity have much much less gravitation force applied to it and so time is not as slowed.. and conversely the opposite is true the more exposure to the singularity the younger the star will be regardless of when it was created..
And if we go back to the original point of the singularity we may find it is still there, pristine and new and in the first micro seconds of expression.. we would not be able to observe it, we would only feel its gravitational affects/effects.
I would say.. the singularity is unobservable, because if it could be observable it would change its structure to become un-observable as all forces of this magnitude are naturally inclined.
So to us.. observable stars give us clues to their age, but if we could measure the stars at the edge of our universe and the age of the stars closest to the singularity.. so to us the universe is around 14 billion years old.. if we could measure both accurately we would have three points and an average.. so we would find out if my idea is correct.
Perhaps.. and I am an advocate of faster than light speeds.. but perhaps when the expression of the singularity happens/happening/happened the outer edge of the those expressions are obeying the speed of light, its just from our perspective they are travelling faster than light as we are closer to the singularity and so the center of greater gravity (see illustration above), so the edge of the universe could be travelling at the speed of light but because we observe it from a location closer to the singularity it seems it is travelling faster than light.
This theory of mine explains a lot of discrepancies in other peoples theories.
I think I will call my theory 'Schrodinger's Clock'. The two states being time, one older, one younger.
Wish I could send this to be checked by a physicist.. not sure what to do. I'm a musician by education.
-------------
Things that make sense..
The flatter space-time is, the freer the objects are to move faster away from the singularity, this is not only based on how gravity affects space itself, increasing one objects gravity on another, but the flater space is the less an object is part of that part of the universe.. so.. off the top of my head.. we could perceive tachyons that came from the edge of the universe, travelling back towards the singularity.
*I am aware of the Einstein's theory of special and general relativity, I am saying.. this also applies to the universe's age.
Stars that are 'older' than the universe: when we (at our point) were the edge of the universe we were travelling faster than light up until that point (the speed of light being slower the closer you get to the singularity).. now we have 'normalized'.. not definitive, but this could be an explanation for their true age (if accurate).
Given that the most powerful object we can perceive is a black hole; outwardly a black hole is a sphere, but internally (from the perspective of space) it is an inverse cone. The MBR is a picture of the outward sphere of the singularity, but internally it is totally possible, like a black hole, we are conical.
I believe the singularity is still happening, as an object so powerful would slow down time so much it would become near perpetual to itself. Like the black hole releasing hawking radiation (which I would like to posit is some kind of 'dark light') the singularity releases light and space, which converts to time once released and out of its sheared (most extreme) influence.
We could never travel to the singularity due to the laws of space breaking down, it would be like trying to complete a circular maze but there isn't always a way forward (a solution) to the center.
TL:DR
The further from the singularity the higher the speed of light. (very mangled TL:DR )
---------------
Credit for the cone graphics:
https://qr.ae/pNrOhY
The further from the singularity the higher the speed of light. (very mangled TL:DR )
---------------
Credit for the cone graphics:
https://qr.ae/pNrOhY
No comments:
Post a Comment